#
Company
Buy Side Availability
Digital Accessibility
Governance
Relevance
Supply Side Digitization
Score

261

AGRIBIODINAMICA
2.0
1.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
1.8 / 5

262

ALLIANCE FOR FLEXIBLE POLYURETHANE FOAM
1.0
1.0
2.0
4.0
1.0
1.8 / 5

263

Basel Action Network
1.0
1.0
4.0
1.0
2.0
1.8 / 5

264

BIOGRO NEW ZEALAND
1.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
2.0
1.8 / 5

265

Braskem
1.0
1.0
4.0
2.0
1.0
1.8 / 5

266

BUREAU OF AGRICULTURE AND FISHERIES PRODUCT STANDARDS (BAFPS)
1.0
1.0
4.0
2.0
1.0
1.8 / 5

267

CERTIFIED NATURALLY GROWN
1.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
2.0
1.8 / 5

268

Chargeurs Group
2.0
1.0
4.0
1.0
1.0
1.8 / 5

269

Collaborative for High Performance Schools
2.0
1.0
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.8 / 5

270

Composite Panel Association
1.0
2.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
1.8 / 5

How We Rate Standard Owners

One of the biggest challenges in the sustainability industry is the need for more normalized data on sustainable procurement. Today, there are more standards that define sustainability than consumers can understand. At CommonShare we are launching the world’s most comprehensive system for the comparative evaluation of Standard Owners' to make it easier for brands and consumers to understand which standards are relevant and worth incorporating into their sustainable procurement plan. We are not interested in evaluating the sustainability characteristics, i.e., which Standard Owner represents sustainability better, but rather the weight they play in sustainable procurement and their governance implications.